Skip navigation, go to content.
Institute of Museum and Library Services

Introduction

IMLS Support

Key Findings

Methodology

Museums

Public Libraries

Academic Libraries

Archives

•  OVERVIEW
•  SIZE ANALYSES

State Library Agencies

Afterword

Appendix: Surveys

 

Download PDF (1.7MB)

Publications - Reports

Archives

In this chapter, we provide an overview of the archives data and a detailed description of certain survey question responses by archives size.

1. ARCHIVES OVERVIEW

1.1 Technology Overview

  • Availability of funding: Of all archives surveyed, 76.5 percent report having received funding for technology in the past 12 months, and 67.3 percent expect to receive funds for the next 12 months.
  • Adequacy of technology funding: Overall, 51.8 percent of archives report that the majority of their technology needs are adequately funded; 30.9 percent report that 25 percent or less of their technology needs are adequately funded.
  • Maintaining and adding technologies: All archives, regardless of size, agree that their institutions are able to maintain their current levels of technology, but they are neutral on their institutions' ability to add new uses of technology to meet evolving needs.
  • Technology capacity: Overall, 54.8 percent of archives report that they have the capacity to meet or almost meet their missions.
  • Technologies in use: Almost all archives use basic computer technologies: e-mail is used by 99.0 percent of all archives; office productivity software is used by 98.1 percent; and desktop computers are used by 96.2 percent. In addition, 95.2 percent of all archives have Web sites. Also used widely by all archives are the following:

               •  LANs (local area networks), used by 82.5 percent.
               •  Broadband Internet connections, used by 78.6 percent.
               •  Computerized catalog of library or other collections, used by 72.5 percent.
               •  Accounting/payroll/human resources software, used by 70.0 percent.

  • Staff for technology activities: The majority of archives (79.4%), regardless of size, do not have enough skilled staff to perform their technology activities.
  • Needs assessment: Only 14.7 percent of archives report that they conduct assessments of user or visitor needs for technology-supported services or experiences at their institutions. Among the archives that do conduct assessments, medium archives are the most active, with 19.2 percent conducting such assessments.

1.2 Digitization

  • Digitization policies: Overall, fewer than half of all archives have digitization policies in place across the range of policy areas. Large archives demonstrate some strong policy efforts; 70.8 percent of large archives have policies in place related to access and 70.8 percent have policies relating to digital formats.
  • Funding for digitization activities: Overall, 57.4 percent of archives had funding for digitization over the last 12 months. Three-quarters of all large archives (75.0%) had funding for digitization, whereas only 64.0 percent of medium and 46.2 percent of small archives did. In the next 12 months, 59.0 percent of all archives expect to receive funding for digitization activities.
  • Digitization priorities: Digitizing photographs is a top priority for 65.0 percent of all archives surveyed; digitizing historical documents/archives is important to 59.0 percent of archives; and digitizing images of items in their collections is a top priority for 20.0 percent of archives.
  • Materials and images digitized: Archives are active digitizers. Overall, 45.0 percent of archives digitized 1 to 500 items and 12.0 percent digitized more than 25,000 items in the past 12 months. Only 6.0 percent of archives report having digitized no items in the past 12 months.
  • Materials or images still to be digitized: Across all archives, 64.2 percent report having more than 25,000 items left to digitize, including 95.7 percent of all large archives. Only 2.1 percent of archives report having no items still to digitize; these are all small archives.
  • Undertaking digitization activities: Of all archives surveyed, 70.4 perform digitization activities by training current staff; 27.6 percent perform these activities by reassigning staff; 39.8 percent use volunteers to perform digitization activities; 16.3 percent use commercial vendors off-site; 14.3 percent hire new institutional staff; and 13.3 percent use contractual staff in-house.
  • Making digital images available: The majority of archives (81.6%), regardless of size, make some or all of their digital image collections available to the public. Access is provided via the Web by 66.3 percent and on-site by 57.0 percent of archives. The top three target audiences for digital images among all archives are the general public who have Internet access (71.4%), other researchers and scholars (60.2%), and on-site visitors (44.9%).
  • Needs assessment: The majority of archives (94.9%), regardless of size, do not conduct assessments of user or visitor needs for digitized materials and images in their institutions.
  • Collaboration: When archives collaborate to perform digitization activities, 41.9 percent turn to State library agencies, 41.9 percent turn to academic libraries, and 25.8 percent collaborate with historical societies.
  • Capability for digitization activities: On a scale of 1 (deficient) to 5 (fully capable), large archives rate themselves more capable than do small and medium archives. For large archives, "staff skills and expertise" and "equipment and software" (3.7) are the strongest categories. Among all archives, funding is the weakest category (1.9).
  • Hindrances to digitization: Using a scale of 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree), archives rate "lack of staff time" (1.6), "lack of funds" (1.6), and "other projects have higher priorities" (2.0) as the strongest hindrances to their digitization activities.
2. ARCHIVES SIZE ANALYSES

This section highlights the difference between small, medium, and large archives based on their budget size and discusses issues related to technology and digitization comparing how these issues differ among the three size categories. To determine the small, medium, and large categories, we use the archives survey question C on archives annual budget size.

FIGURE 1. ARCHIVES SIZE ANALYSES
Size of Archives' Annual Budget (2004) Budget Category
Less than $250,000 Small
$250,001-$500,000
$500,001-$750,000
Medium
$750,001-$1,000,000
$1,000,001-$5,000,000
$5,000,001-$10,000,000
$10,000,001-$25,000,000
More than $25,000,000
Large

Note: Data are based on responses to survey question C; respondents were asked to select only one option.

2.1 Demographics

A total of 117 archives participated in the survey. Two surveys were removed from the analyses due to a large amount of incomplete data, resulting in a final sample size of 115. However, not all archives participants responded to every question, so the sample sizes in the tables below might be slightly lower than 115. In addition, some tables are broken down by size of archives while others are presented on the whole, which may result in different sample sizes for different tables.

Type of Archival Institution

Figure 2 shows the type of archives that responded to the survey. The majority of archives (58%) were not-for-profit.

FIGURE 2. TYPE OF ARCHIVAL INSTITUTION
Type Small (n=59) Medium (n=27) Large (n=27) Total (n=113)
Federal government archives 6.8% 0.0% 3.7% 4.4%
State government archives 3.4% 29.6% 59.3% 23.0%
Local government archives (e.g., county, municipal) 18.6% 18.5% 0.0% 14.2%
Not-for-profit 71.2% 51.9% 33.3% 57.5%
For-profit 0.0% 0.0% 3.7% 0.9%

Note: Data are based on responses to survey question A; respondents were asked to select only one option.

Affiliated Institutions

Figure 3 shows the affiliation of the archives in the survey. More than one-third of archives report that they are affiliated with another type of organization, while almost one-quarter report that they are separate or independent archives, and about one-fifth report that they are affiliated with a historical society.

FIGURE 3. AFFILIATED INSTITUTIONS
Type Small (n=58) Medium (n=27) Large (n=26) Total (n=116)
Affiliated with a college or university 1.7% 3.7% 3.8% 2.7%
Affiliated with a museum 12.1% 11.1% 3.8% 9.9%
Affiliated with a library 8.6% 7.4% 0.0% 6.3%
Affiliated with a historical society 15.5% 25.9% 15.4% 18.0%
Affiliated with other type of organization 43.1% 33.3% 38.5% 39.6%
Separate/independent archives 19.0% 18.5% 38.5% 23.4%

Note: Data are based on responses to survey question B; respondents were asked to select only one option.

Budget

Figure 4 shows the annual budget reported by archives. More than half of the archives reported an annual budget of $250,000 or less.

FIGURE 4. PERCENTAGE OF ARCHIVES WITH EACH SIZE ANNUAL BUDGET
Budget Percent (n=115)
Less than $250,000 53.0%
$250,001-$500,000 20.0%
$500,001-$750,000 3.5%
$750,001-$1,000,000 7.0%
$1,000,001-$5,000,000 11.3%
$5,000,001-$10,000,000 3.5%
$10,000,001-$25,000,000 0.9%
More than $25,000,000 0.9%

Note: Data are based on responses to survey question C; respondents were asked to select only one option.

Staff Size

Figure 5 shows the percentage of full-time staff reported by archives. The majority of archives (60.7%) report having fewer than five full-time staff.

FIGURE 5. PERCENTAGE OF ARCHIVES WITH EACH SIZE CURRENT PAID, FULL-TIME-EQUIVALENT STAFF
Staff Size Percent (n=115)
Less than 5 60.7%
6-10 15.4%
11-25 12.8%
26-75 9.4%
76-150 0.9%
151-250 0.0%
251-500 0.0%
501-1,000 0.0%
1,001-1,500 0.0%
More than 1,500 0.9%

Note: Data are based on responses to survey question D; respondents were asked to select only one option.

2.2 Technology

Technology Funding

Seventy-seven percent of all archives report having funding for technology in the past 12 months, and 67.3 percent expect to receive funding for the next 12 months.

FIGURE 6. FUNDING FOR TECHNOLOGY
Response Option Small (n=60) Medium (n=27) Large (n=26) Total (n=113)
In the past 12 months, did your institution have funding for technology?
Yes 63.9% 88.9% 92.6% 76.5%
No 31.1% 7.4% 7.4% 20.0%
Don't know/Not applicable 4.9% 3.7% 0.0% 3.5%
In the next 12 months, do you plan to have funding for your technology?
Yes 60.0% 74.1% 76.9% 67.3%
No 20.0% 3.7% 7.7% 13.3%
Don't know/Not applicable 20.0% 22.2% 15.4% 19.5%

Note: Data are based on responses to survey questions 1 and 2; respondents were asked to select only one option.

Adequate Funding of Technology Needs

Across all archives, about one-third report that 1 to 25 percent of their technology needs are adequately funded. Almost one-quarter of small archives report that 100 percent of their technology needs are adequately funded.

FIGURE 7. PERCENTAGE OF TECHNOLOGY NEEDS THAT ARE ADEQUATELY FUNDED
Response Option Small (n=59) Medium (n=26) Large (n=25) Total (n=110)
0% 8.5% 3.8% 0.0% 5.5%
1-25% 33.9% 30.8% 24.0% 30.9%
26-50% 13.6% 11.5% 8.0% 11.8%
51-75% 13.6% 26.9% 24.0% 19.1%
76-99% 8.5% 23.1% 36.0% 18.2%
100% 22.0% 3.8% 8.0% 14.5%

Note: Data are based on responses to survey question 3; respondents were asked to select only one option.

Maintaining and Adding Technology

Figure 8 shows the mean ratings of an institution's ability to maintain or add technology based on a 5-point scale, with "1" meaning strongly agree and "5" meaning strongly disagree. Therefore, ratings less than 2.5 indicate agreement, ratings between 2.5 and 3.5 indicate neither agreement nor disagreement, and ratings greater than 3.5 indicate disagreement.

All archives agree that their institutions are able to maintain their current levels of technology, but they are neutral about their institutions' ability to add new uses of technology to meet evolving needs.

FIGURE 8. ABILITY TO MAINTAIN AND ADD TECHNOLOGY
My institution is able to: Small (n=56) Medium (n=25) Large (n=24) Total (n=105)
Maintain its current level of technology 2.4 2.4 2.2 2.4
Add new uses of technology to meet evolving needs 3.4 3.0 3.2 3.3

Note: Data are based on responses to survey question 4. The scale for this question was 1, meaning strongly agree, to 5, meaning strongly disagree.

Extent of Technology Capacity

The majority of archives, regardless of size, either currently have the technology capacity necessary to meet their mission or have almost enough capacity to meet their mission. Forty percent (40.3%) report that their technology capacity is short of meeting their mission or does not meet their mission.

FIGURE 9. TECHNOLOGY CAPACITY TO MEET MISSION
Response Option Small (n=57) Medium (n=25) Large (n=24) Total (n=106)
Currently meets our mission 25.0% 22.6% 22.2% 23.7%
Almost meets our mission 27.9% 35.5% 32.3% 31.1%
Is short of meeting our mission 27.5% 35.5% 40.4% 32.8%
Does not meet our mission 10.3% 5.6% 4.0% 7.5%
Don't know/Not applicable 9.3% 0.8% 1.0% 4.9%

Note: Data are based on responses to survey question 5; respondents were asked to select only one option.

Technologies Used in Past 12 Months

Almost all archives (99.0%), regardless of size, used e-mail in the past 12 months. In addition, 98.1 percent used office productivity software, 96.2 percent used desktop computers, and 95.2 percent had Web sites.

FIGURE 10. ARCHIVES THAT USED THE FOLLOWING TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS
Technology Small (n=55) Medium (n=26) Large (n=24) Total (n=105)
Accounting/payroll/human resources software 55.7% 85.7% 96.0% 70.0%
Broadband Internet connection 71.4% 87.5% 91.7% 78.6%
Computerized catalog of library or other collections 62.3% 73.3% 96.2% 72.5%
Computerized collections management system 50.0% 70.6% 92.0% 63.7%
Database software or system for membership development 46.8% 56.3% 70.8% 53.9%
Desktop computers 93.7% 100.0% 100.0% 96.2%
E-mail 98.4% 100.0% 100.0% 99.0%
GIS (geographic information systems) applications 6.9% 25.0% 17.4% 12.4%
Integrated library system (ILS) 10.5% 26.7% 45.8% 21.9%
Intranet 45.8% 80.0% 75.0% 58.2%
LAN (local area network) 73.8% 94.1% 96.0% 82.5%
Marketing and promotion software and systems 6.8% 13.3% 34.8% 14.4%
Meta- or federated searching in online collections and catalogs 13.3% 33.3% 33.3% 21.2%
Modem-based Internet connection (dial-up access) 26.7% 25.0% 20.8% 25.0%
Multimedia services or collections 30.5% 26.7% 56.5% 36.1%
Notebook or tablet computers 35.0% 60.0% 72.0% 48.0%
Office productivity software, including word processing, desktop publishing, and spreadsheets 96.8% 100.0% 100.0% 98.1%
PDAs (personal digital assistant handheld devices, e.g., Palm Pilots) 24.1% 13.3% 20.8% 21.6%
Personal information management (PIM) software 10.2% 13.3% 13.0% 11.3%
Point-of-sale software and systems 11.7% 40.0% 33.3% 21.2%
RFID (radio frequency identification) in services or collections 0.0% 0.0% 4.5% 1.1%
Software to manage public-access computers and printing 10.3% 20.0% 58.3% 23.7%
Video tours 6.9% 6.7% 4.2% 6.2%
Virtual reality tours 3.6% 6.7% 4.2% 4.2%
Web portal or gateway for services or collections 22.4% 60.0% 75.0% 41.2%
Web site for your institution 92.1% 100.0% 100.0% 95.2%
Wireless network, including WiFi 8.6% 42.9% 24.0% 17.5%
Other 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 8.0%

Note: Data are based on responses to survey question 6; respondents were asked to select all that apply.

The majority of small archives (56.4%) used between 6 and 10 technologies in the past 12 months, while all medium and large archives used between 6 and 20 technologies.

FIGURE 11. PERCENTAGE OF ARCHIVES THAT USED THE FOLLOWING NUMBER OF TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS
Number Small (n=55) Medium (n=26) Large (n=24) Total (n=105)
0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
1-5 12.6% 0.0% 0.0% 6.7%
6-10 56.4% 30.8% 8.3% 39.0%
11-15 25.5% 38.4% 37.5% 31.4%
16-20 5.5% 30.8% 54.2% 22.9%
21 or more 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Note: Data are based on responses to survey question 6.

Staff Capabilities

Overall, more than three-fourths of archives (79.4%) report that they do not have enough skilled staff to accomplish their technology activities.

FIGURE 12. EXTENT TO WHICH ARCHIVES HAVE SUFFICIENT SKILLED STAFF TO ACCOMPLISH TECHNOLOGY ACTIVITIES
Response Option Budget Small (n=52) Medium (n=26) Large (n=24) Total (n=102)
We do not have enough skilled staff to accomplish our technology activities. 80.8% 76.9% 79.2% 79.4%
We have the right amount of skilled staff to accomplish our technology activities. 15.4% 19.2% 12.5% 15.7%
We have more than enough skilled staff to accomplish our technology activities. 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Other (please list) 1.9% 3.8% 8.3% 3.9%
Don't know/Not applicable 1.9% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0%

Note: Data are based on responses to survey question 10; respondents were asked to select only one option.

Needs Assessments

More medium and large archives (19.2 and 16.7%, respectively) conduct assessments of user or visitor needs for technology-supported services or experiences at their institutions than small archives (11.5%).

FIGURE 13. CONDUCT NEEDS ASSESSMENTS FOR TECHNOLOGY-SUPPORTED SERVICES
Response Option Small (n=52) Medium (n=26) Large (n=24) Total (n=102)
Yes 11.5% 19.2% 16.7% 14.7%
No 86.5% 73.1% 83.3% 82.4%
Don't know/Not applicable 1.9% 7.7% 0.0% 2.9%

Note: Data are based on responses to survey question 12; respondents were asked to select only one option.

2.3 Digitization

Digitization Policies

In general, a greater number of large archives have digitization policies in place than medium or small archives. The most prevalent digitization policies among all archives are those for access (45.5% of archives), digital format (40.4%), and security (26.5%). The least prevalent policies include those for evaluation (9.2% of archives) and conversion of digital files to next-generation formats (11.1%). Overall, the data show that even the most prevalent policies are in place in fewer than half of all archives.

FIGURE 14. DIGITIZATION POLICIES IN PLACE
Priority Small (n=49) Medium (n=26) Large (n=24) Total (n=99)
Access 36.7% 38.5% 70.8% 45.5%
Best practices 10.4% 30.8% 29.2% 20.4%
Conversion of digital files to next-generation formats 8.2% 11.5% 16.7% 11.1%
Digital format (e.g., TIFF, GIF, PAL) 28.6% 34.6% 70.8% 40.4%
Evaluation 0.0% 16.0% 20.8% 9.2%
Institutional repository 14.3% 25.0% 16.7% 17.5%
Intellectual property issues 10.2% 23.1% 37.5% 20.2%
Materials to be digitized 8.2% 19.2% 33.3% 17.2%
Priorities for digitization 14.6% 19.2% 34.8% 20.6%
Preservation 22.4% 26.9% 20.8% 23.2%
Quality control 10.2% 23.1% 50.0% 23.2%
Standards 10.2% 19.2% 50.0% 22.2%
Metadata 8.2% 15.4% 41.7% 18.2%
Security 18.8% 26.9% 41.7% 26.5%
Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Note: Data are based on response to survey question 16; respondents were asked to select all that apply.

Digitization Funding

A greater number of large archives (75.0%) had funding to support their digitization activities in the past 12 months than medium and small archives (64.0 and 46.2%, respectively).

FIGURE 15. FUNDING TO SUPPORT DIGITIZATION ACTIVITIES
Response Option Small (n=51) Medium (n=25) Large (n=24) Total (n=100)
In the past 12 months, did your institution have funding to support your digitization activities?
Yes 46.2% 64.0% 75.0% 57.4%
No 46.2% 32.0% 25.0% 37.6%
Don't know/Not applicable 7.7% 4.0% 0.0% 5.0%
In the next 12 months, do you plan to obtain funding to support your digitization activities?
Yes 45.1% 80.0% 66.7% 59.0%
No 29.4% 4.0% 12.5% 19.0%
Don't know/Not applicable 25.5% 16.0% 20.8% 22.0%

Note: Data are based on responses to survey questions 18 and 19; respondents were asked to select only one option.

Materials for Digitization

Photographs, historical documents/archives, and manuscripts are the three kinds of materials that archives most commonly digitize. Of all archives surveyed, 17.5 percent report having digitized photographs, 11.6 percent report having digitized historical documents/archives, and 7.4 percent report having digitized manuscripts.

FIGURE 16. MATERIALS THAT HAVE BEEN DIGITIZED IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS OR ARE CURRENTLY BEING DIGITIZED
Material Small (n=51) Medium (n=25) Large (n=24) Total (n=100)
Correspondence, diaries, and other personal records 4.2% 4.2% 14.3% 6.5%
Course material 2.2% 0.0% 0.0% 1.1%
Education and training material about the collections 2.1% 0.0% 4.5% 2.2%
Films, videotapes 6.5% 4.2% 9.1% 6.5%
Government publications 0.0% 0.0% 4.5% 1.1%
Historical documents/archives 12.5% 8.0% 13.6% 11.6%
Images of items in the collections (e.g., art work, artifacts, furniture, plants, animals) 8.2% 4.3% 4.8% 6.5%
Information on the institution 4.2% 8.3% 4.8% 5.4%
Journals and other serials 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Manuscripts 8.3% 4.0% 9.5% 7.4%
Maps 4.3% 8.3% 10.0% 6.6%
Music and other recorded sound 0.0% 4.3% 4.8% 2.2%
Newspapers 2.2% 0.0% 0.0% 1.1%
Photographs 20.4% 20.0% 8.7% 17.5%
Rare books 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Records about the collection 2.1% 4.2% 4.5% 3.2%
Sheet music 2.1% 0.0% 4.8% 2.2%
Special exhibits 6.3% 4.2% 9.1% 6.4%
Theses and dissertations 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Other (please list) 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 5.0%

Note: Data are based on responses to survey question 20; respondents were asked to select all that apply.

Primary Digitization Priorities

The top two digitization priorities for all archives, regardless of size, are as follows:

  • Photographs: 65.0 percent of all archives considered this a digitization priority.
  • Historical documents/archives: 59.0 percent identified this category as a digitization priority.

Images of items in the collections are the third highest digitization priority for small archives, while maps are the third highest digitization priority for medium and large archives.

FIGURE 17. DIGITIZATION PRIORITIES
Priority Small (n=51) Medium (n=25) Large (n=24) Total (n=100)
Correspondence, diaries, and other personal records 9.8% 12.0% 12.5% 11.0%
Course material 2.0% 8.0% 4.2% 4.0%
Education and training material about the collections 7.8% 0.0% 8.3% 6.0%
Films, videotapes 9.8% 12.0% 12.5% 11.0%
Government publications 0.0% 4.0% 0.0% 1.0%
Historical documents/archives 56.9% 64.0% 58.3% 59.0%
Images of items in the collections (e.g., art work, artifacts, furniture, plants, animals) 29.4% 8.0% 12.5% 20.0%
Information on the institution 13.7% 8.0% 0.0% 9.0%
Journals and other serials 7.8% 8.0% 0.0% 6.0%
Manuscripts 15.7% 16.0% 16.7% 16.0%
Maps 9.8% 28.0% 29.2% 19.0%
Music and other recorded sound 5.9% 4.0% 4.2% 5.0%
Newspapers 5.9% 16.0% 4.2% 8.0%
Photographs 58.8% 80.0% 62.5% 65.0%
Rare books 3.9% 0.0% 0.0% 2.0%
Records about the collection 15.7% 16.0% 4.2% 13.0%
Sheet music 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0%
Special exhibits 2.0% 8.0% 8.3% 5.0%
Theses and dissertations 0.0% 4.0% 0.0% 1.0%
Other (please list) 5.9% 0.0% 16.7% 7.0%
Don't know/Not applicable 7.8% 0.0% 4.2% 5.0%

Note: Data are based on responses to survey question 22; respondents were asked to select their institution's top three priorities.

Number of Digital Materials Created in the Past 12 Months

The majority of small archives (56.9%) created between 1 and 500 digital materials or images in the past 12 months, whereas the majority of medium and large archives (56.0 and 54.2%, respectively) created between 1 and 1,000 digital materials or images in the past 12 months.

FIGURE 18. NUMBER OF DIGITAL MATERIALS OR IMAGES CREATED IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS
Number Small (n=51) Medium (n=25) Large (n=24) Total (n=100)
0 7.8% 4.0% 4.2% 6.0%
1-500 56.9% 36.0% 29.2% 45.0%
501-1,000 11.8% 20.0% 25.0% 17.0%
1,001-5,000 7.8% 12.0% 20.8% 12.0%
5,001-10,000 3.9% 8.0% 4.2% 5.0%
10,001-25,000 0.0% 4.0% 8.3% 3.0%
More than 25,000 11.8% 16.0% 8.3% 12.0%

Note: Data are based on responses to survey question 23; respondents were asked to select only one option.

Number of Additional Images Remaining to Be Digitized

Overall, 64.2 percent of all archives have more than 25,000 digital materials or images left to be digitized. Among small archives, 4.1 percent report that they have no materials or images to digitize.

FIGURE 19. NUMBER OF DIGITAL MATERIALS OR IMAGES LEFT TO BE CREATED
Number Small (n=49) Medium (n=23) Large (n=23) Total (n=95)
0 4.1% 0.0% 0.0% 2.1%
1-500 6.1% 8.7% 4.3% 6.3%
501-1,000 8.2% 0.0% 0.0% 4.2%
1,001-5,000 14.3% 8.7% 0.0% 9.5%
5,001-10,000 16.3% 0.0% 0.0% 8.4%
10,001-25,000 8.2% 4.3% 0.0% 5.3%
More than 25,000 42.9% 78.3% 95.7% 64.2%

Note: Data are based on responses to survey question 24; respondents were asked to select only one option.

Undertaking Digitization Activities

More than two-thirds of archives undertake their digitization activities by training current staff to perform these activities; 39.8 percent of them use volunteers.

FIGURE 20. UNDERTAKING DIGITIZATION ACTIVITIES
Response Option Budget Small (n=49) Medium (n=25) Large (n=24) Total (n=98)
Contractual staff were hired to perform these activities in-house. 6.1% 20.0% 20.8% 13.3%
New institutional staff were hired to perform these activities. 10.2% 16.0% 20.8% 14.3%
Current staff were trained to perform these activities. 67.3% 76.0% 70.8% 70.4%
Current staff were reassigned to perform these activities. 26.5% 28.0% 29.2% 27.6%
Volunteers perform these activities. 49.0% 20.0% 41.7% 39.8%
These activities are performed by commercial vendors off-site. 20.4% 8.0% 16.7% 16.3%
Materials are digitized off-site at another institution's digitization center. 4.1% 8.0% 4.2% 5.1%
Other (please list) 2.0% 8.0% 12.5% 6.1%
Don't know/Not applicable 8.2% 4.0% 0.0% 5.1%

Note: Data are based on responses to survey question 26; respondents were asked to select all that apply.

The Availability of Digital Image Collections to the Public

Overall, 81.6 percent of archives make some or all of their digital image collections available to the public.

FIGURE 21. PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF DIGITAL IMAGE COLLECTIONS
Response Option Small (n=49) Medium (n=25) Large (n=24) Total (n=98)
Yes, some of our digital image collections are available to the public. 57.1% 64.0% 58.3% 59.2%
Yes, all of our digital image collections are available to the public. 20.4% 20.0% 29.2% 22.4%
No, our digital image collections are not available to the public. 10.2% 12.0% 12.5% 11.2%
Don't know/Not applicable 12.2% 4.0% 0.0% 7.1%

Note: Data are based on responses to survey question 27; respondents were asked to select only one option.

How Digital Image Collections Are Made Available

Of the large archives that make their digital image collections available to the public, almost all make their collections available on the Web, while almost half make their collections available on the premises on their computer networks (LANs).

Of the small and medium archives that make their digital image collections available to the public, slightly more make them available on the premises on their computer networks (LANs) than on the Web.

FIGURE 22. HOW DIGITAL IMAGE COLLECTIONS ARE MADE AVAILABLE
Response Option Small (n=43) Medium (n=22) Large (n=21) Total (n=86)
On the premises on our computer network (LAN) 55.8% 68.2% 47.6% 57.0%
On the Web 53.5% 63.6% 95.2% 66.3%
Through a third party 7.0% 9.1% 9.5% 8.1%
Don't know/Not applicable 16.3% 4.5% 0.0% 9.3%

Note: Data are based on responses to survey question 28; respondents were asked to select all that apply. Table only includes respondents who reported that they make some or all of their digital image collections available to the public.

Target Audience

Of all archives surveyed, 71.4 percent identified the general public who have Internet access as their target audience for access to digital images, 60.2 percent identified other researchers and scholars as their target audience, and 44.9 percent identified on-site visitors as their target audience for access to digital images.

FIGURE 23. TARGET AUDIENCE
Response Option Budget Small (n=49) Medium (n=25) Large (n=24) Total (n=98)
General public who have Internet access 67.3% 60.0% 91.7% 71.4%
On-site visitors at our institution 44.9% 64.0% 25.0% 44.9%
Members (e.g., library card holders, museum members) 22.4% 28.0% 8.3% 20.4%
Our staff 44.9% 48.0% 29.2% 41.8%
Consortia/partners 6.1% 4.0% 4.2% 5.1%
Researchers/scholars at our institution 28.6% 20.0% 20.8% 24.5%
Faculty at our institution 4.1% 0.0% 0.0% 2.0%
Educators not part of our institution 6.1% 8.0% 20.8% 10.2%
Students at our institution 6.1% 4.0% 0.0% 4.1%
Students at affiliated institutions 4.1% 8.0% 0.0% 4.1%
Alumni 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0%
Other researchers and scholars 57.1% 56.0% 70.8% 60.2%
Other 0.0% 0.0% 16.7% 4.1%
Don't know/Not applicable 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Note: Data are based on responses to survey question 33; respondents were asked to select their institution's top three target audiences.

Needs Assessments

Most archives (94.9%) do not conduct assessments of user or visitor needs for digitized materials and images.

FIGURE 24. CONDUCT NEEDS ASSESSMENTS FOR DIGITIZED MATERIALS
Response Option Small (n=49) Medium (n=25) Large (n=24) Total (n=98)
Yes 2.0% 4.0% 4.2% 3.1%
No 95.9% 92.0% 95.8% 94.9%
Don't know/Not applicable 2.0% 4.0% 0.0% 2.0%

Note: Data are based on responses to survey question 35; respondents were asked to select only one option.

Collaboration

Nearly one-third (32.7%) of all archives collaborate (through specific partnering agreements) with other institutions and organizations to digitize materials.

FIGURE 25. COLLABORATION TO DIGITIZE MATERIALS
Response Option Small (n=49) Medium (n=25) Large (n=24) Total (n=98)
Yes 20.4% 28.0% 62.5% 32.7%
No 73.5% 68.0% 37.5% 63.3%
Don't know/Not applicable 6.1% 4.0% 0.0% 4.1%

Note: Data are based on responses to survey question 37; respondents were asked to select only one option.

Of the archives that do collaborate to digitize materials, 41.9 percent turn to State library agencies, 41.9 percent turn to academic libraries, and 25.8 percent collaborate with historical societies.

FIGURE 26. COLLABORATION WITH OTHER INSTITUTIONS AND ORGANIZATIONS
Response Option Small (n=9) Medium (n=7) Large (n=15) Total (n=31)
State library agencies 33.3% 42.9% 46.7% 41.9%
Academic libraries 55.6% 28.6% 40.0% 41.9%
Individual public libraries 44.4% 14.3% 0.0% 16.1%
Private libraries 11.1% 14.3% 0.0% 6.5%
Museums 44.4% 14.3% 13.3% 22.6%
Consortia 0.0% 14.3% 26.7% 16.1%
State archives 22.2% 0.0% 6.7% 9.7%
Special libraries 22.2% 0.0% 13.3% 12.9%
Historical societies 44.4% 28.6% 13.3% 25.8%
Federal government agencies or archives 0.0% 14.3% 13.3% 9.7%
Other state government agencies 0.0% 14.3% 26.7% 16.1%
City, municipal, or other local government agencies or archives 22.2% 14.3% 0.0% 9.7%
Universities and colleges 22.2% 14.3% 26.7% 22.6%
Community organizations 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Private companies 0.0% 0.0% 6.7% 3.2%
Foundations 0.0% 0.0% 13.3% 6.5%
State library associations 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
State museum associations 0.0% 14.3% 0.0% 3.2%
Other professional associations 0.0% 14.3% 0.0% 3.2%
Other 22.2% 28.6% 26.7% 25.8%

Note: Data are based on responses to survey question 37; respondents were asked to select all that apply.

Capabilities in Initiating, Accomplishing, and Sustaining Digitization Activities

At initiating, accomplishing, and sustaining digitization activities, large archives rate themselves as capable in all areas except funding. Small archives rate themselves as deficient in most areas.

Figure 27 shows the average ratings of an institution's capability at initiating, accomplishing, and sustaining digitization activities based on a 5-point scale, with 1 meaning deficient and 5 meaning fully capable. Therefore, ratings less than 2.5 tend to indicate deficiency, and ratings greater than 2.5 tend to indicate capability.

FIGURE 27. CAPABILITY TO INITIATE, ACCOMPLISH, AND SUSTAIN DIGITIZATION ACTIVITIES
Capability Small (n=49) Medium (n=25) Large (n=24) Total (n=98)
Staff skills and expertise 2.6 3.1 3.7 3.0
Equipment and software 2.4 2.8 3.7 2.8
Funding 1.7 1.8 2.3 1.9
Established digitization plan 1.9 2.3 2.7 2.2
Established digitization policies 1.9 2.5 3.0 2.3
Established quality standards 1.9 2.7 3.4 2.5
Established procedures for preparation for creating digital images 2.0 2.6 3.2 2.5
Established procedures for the management of images and files 2.2 2.8 3.2 2.6
Other (please list) 1.3 0.0 0.0 1.3

Note: Data are based on responses to survey question 39; respondents were asked to rate their institution's capability. The scale for this question was 1, meaning deficient, to 5, meaning fully capable.

Hindrances to Digitization Activities

Archives (regardless of size) most strongly agree that "lack of staff time," "lack of funds," and "other projects have higher priorities" are hindrances to their digitization activities. Small archives regard "lack of sufficient equipment and/or software" as a hindrance.

FIGURE 28. HINDRANCES TO DIGITIZATION ACTIVITIES
Response Option Small (n=48) Medium (n=25) Large (n=24) Total (n=97)
Lack of staff time 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.6
Lack of staff skills and expertise 2.0 2.8 3.0 2.5
Lack of funds 1.5 1.6 1.8 1.6
Lack of sufficient equipment and/or software 1.9 2.2 3.0 2.3
Lack of an established digitization plan 2.2 2.5 2.6 2.4
Lack of established digitization policies 2.3 2.7 3.0 2.6
Lack of established quality standards 2.3 2.8 3.2 2.7
Lack of established policies and procedures for preparation for materials for digitizing 2.4 2.8 3.1 2.7
Lack of established policies and procedures for the management of images and files 2.4 2.7 2.8 2.6
Other projects have higher priorities 1.9 2.0 2.4 2.0
Concern about intellectual property issues 3.0 2.6 3.3 3.0
Security concerns 3.1 3.0 3.6 3.2
Not having collections worth digitizing 4.5 4.9 4.6 4.6
Concern about costs of preservation and management 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.3
Management is unaware of the benefits of digitization 3.7 3.8 4.2 3.9
Other (please list) 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0

Note: Data are based on responses to survey question 40; respondents were asked to rate each potential hindrance. The scale for this question was 1, meaning strongly agree, to 5, meaning strongly disagree.


back to top
 
Grant Applicants   Grant Recipients   Grant Reviewers   Project Profiles   State Programs
Resources   News & Events   About Us   National Initiatives   Grant Search   Press Room
Related Links   Contact Us   Privacy Policy   FOIA