You are here
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions About PRA / Information Collection
These are some of the most commonly asked questions about the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) and the associated clearance process.
A. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) clearance is the term used for the process of obtaining approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for federally sponsored data collections as required by the PRA. OMB was originally granted this authority in 1940 under the Federal Reports Act. Due to increasing complaints from the public about duplicate and lengthy federal government data collections, Congress passed the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1980 which were reissued in 1995. The purpose of the Act remains to ensure that federal agencies do not overburden the public with federally sponsored data collections. OMB review considerations range from policy issues to statistical design and methodology. OMB pays particular attention to the practical utility of the data to the federal government. PRA clearance is required when standardized data collection from 10 or more respondents is collected in response to a federally sponsored data collection within a 12 month period.
Many use the term "OMB Clearance", but since OMB clearance is required for several federal government activities, in order to distinguish OMB Clearance under the PRA, IMLS uses the term "PRA Clearance". This distinguishes OMB clearance due to the PRA.
Whether a question is identical depends on whether each respondent or group of respondents (e.g. focus group) is being asked to provide the same level of information on the same subject. Identical questions need not be phrased exactly the same way each time they are asked, nor does each respondents need to be asked the same "set of questions."
A respondent includes individuals; partnerships; associations; corporations; business trusts; legal representatives; organized groups of individuals; and State, territory, tribal or local governments.
Data collection is considered federally sponsored when a federal agency:
- causes another agency to collect information;
- contracts or enters into a cooperative agreement to collect information; or
- requires a person to provide information to another person, or otherwise causes another person to obtain, retain, solicit, or require the disclosure to third parties or the public.
The PRA only applies to collections directed at 10 or more respondents, but with one important exception. Any information requirement in a "rule of general applicability" is presumed to affect or potentially affect at least 10 respondents, even if IMLS expects there to be fewer respondents. A rule should be considered to have general applicability unless you can demonstrate that it would be impossible for there to ever be 10 respondents.
For government employees, yes. The objective of the law is to reduce the paperwork burden on the public. The process of trying to do that adds to government paperwork.
- which are voluntary in nature?
- which do not involve any forms (paper)?
- which are conducted over the telephone?
- performed as a part of a focus group or roundtable?
- where only one question is asked?
- which will only be conducted one time?
- which are a part of a pilot project or program?
- which is the result of an Executive Order or Statute?
- which are customer satisfaction surveys (paper or web-based)?
The Paperwork Reduction Act is a law and must be complied with regardless of the origin, mode, or reason for the collection. In accordance with the PRA, OMB approval must be obtained prior to collecting information in any situation where 10 or more respondents are involved and the questions are standardized in nature.
For Grants, there is usually very little federal involvement in the data collection. Therefore, PRA review and clearance may not be needed. However, there are exceptions. For example, if the federal government specifies a standard reporting mechanism for the grantees, PRA clearance would be required.
Does the recipient of a "Cooperative Agreement" need PRA clearance to conduct surveys under the agreement?
Cooperative Agreements, PRA review and approval is required if IMLS has significant input/control into the design, methodology, and analysis of the data collection or if the data is stored at the IMLS level. Because the need for PRA clearance is dependent on the level of control the government has over the collection, if the need for PRA clearance is not clearly evident, questions about whether a cooperative agreement requires PRA review and approval should be directed to the IMLS Clearance Officer.
In Contracts, the IMLS has complete responsibility for the data and data collections procedures. IMLS owns the data and it is stored at IMLS. Therefore, all data collections performed under contracts need PRA clearance. A collection conducted by a state agency needs clearance if IMLS is specifically paying the state to conduct a collection or if IMLS must approve a data collection instrument (e.g. a form).
Not usually. No clearance is needed if the attendees are just asked to comment or give suggestions on the program or subject in question. If, however, the group is gathered for the purpose of having attendees respond to a specific set of formatted questions, then the PRA DOES apply.
Do you need PRA clearance if you just ask people for comments on a document or public comments through the Federal Register?
Not unless, respondents are asked to respond to specific questions in their comments. If the comment is very general, the PRA doesn't apply. Please note that general public comments can provide limited data and will work well if the program just wants to identify a perceived issue or concern. However, since the responses are limited to what the respondent wants to share with the requestor, useful unbiased data for use at the policy making or research level cannot be obtained from public comments alone.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Clearance and PRA Clearance are 2 separate clearances. Having one of the two clearances does not negate the need for the other. In some instances, both clearances are necessary for a research project. If the research requires standardized data from 10 or more respondents, PRA Clearance will be required. If the research is clinical in nature, the need for PRA Clearance will have to be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. PRA Clearance may be partially or fully exempt. Establish the need for PRA Clearance early in the process. Projects requiring PRA Clearance that only have IRB Clearance will be considered violations under the PRA. If the need for clearance is unclear, consult with the IMLS Clearance Officer for a final determination.
Yes, except PRA clearance is not necessary for very general invitations for public comments and suggestions. The PRA DOES apply if specific questions are asked.
You need to obtain clearance for any information you gather from foreign citizens or companies. You do not need clearance for information submitted by a foreign government, with one caveat. If a foreign government is required to gather information from its citizens to meet a U.S. requirement (i.e. passports), then PRA clearance is needed. Refer to the IMLS Clearance Officer for guidance on the specific situation.
Agencies are instructed to complete Part B if they are using statistical methods, such as sampling, imputation, or other statistical estimation techniques; most research collections or program evaluations should also complete Part B.5 If an agency is planning to conduct a sample survey as part of its information collection, Part B of the ICR supporting statement must be completed, and an agency should also complete relevant portions of Part B when conducting a census survey (collections that are sent to the entire universe or population under study). For example, an agency doing a census of a small, well-defined population may not need to describe sampling procedures requested in Part B, but it should address what pretesting has taken place, what its data collection procedures are, how it will maximize response rates, and how it will deal with missing unit and item data.
Agencies conducting qualitative research studies or program evaluations, including case studies or focus groups, should also complete the relevant sections of Part B to provide a more complete description of the use of the information and the methods for collecting the information (see next question).
Why do agencies need to complete some of Part B if they are conducting qualitative research studies or program evaluations?
Agencies need to specify how they plan to use the information they are collecting and how they will collect the information in order for OMB to properly evaluate an ICR that uses qualitative methods. There are elements of Part B that are not covered elsewhere in the justification that agencies should answer to appropriately describe the information collection. For example, an agency conducting case studies should specify in Part B:
- how the different sites and/or respondents will be selected,
- whether the agency intends to generalize beyond the specific sites and/or respondents selected,
- what pretesting has been done, and
- what different methods will be used to collect the information, e.g., in-person interviews, focus groups, observations, etc. and the protocols that will be followed to ensure high quality data are obtained.
In addition, agencies will need to justify why they are not using statistical methods if their research questions are most appropriately addressed by a survey or other quantitative study.
The process varies depending on the subject matter of the data collection. In general, there are four steps to preparing and submitting and information collection request for PRA approval.
Step 1: The IMLS PRA Coordinator, in consultation with the "sponsor" of the information collection, prepares and publishes a notice in the Federal Register to provide a 60-day period for the public to comment on the reporting and record keeping requirements associated with the information collection.
Step 2: Prepare an information collection request (ICR) package. A complete package should contain the following items in the order listed:
- Supporting Statement
- Copies of all the necessary attachments. These attachments can include data collection instruments (questionnaires, surveys, etc.), instructions, scripts, consent forms, IRB letters, and other reference materials related to the collection (e.g., OIG/GAO audits or studies substantiating the need for the collection, copies of documents published as a result of previous collection efforts, etc.)
Step 3: The 30-Day Federal Register Notice created and published by the IMLS PRA Coordinator.
Step 4 The IMLS Clearance Officer reviews the collection for quality and potential duplication across the Department prior to forwarding the collection to OMB.
The complete review and approval process can take anywhere from 6-9 months, depending on the number of requests currently in process and the data collection subject matter. This estimate includes the 60-day and 30-day public comment periods and the 60 days OMB has to review and act upon each submission. If the information collection is in a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), please consult with the IMLS Clearance Officer.
There are provisions in the PRA for emergency processing of ICR packages. Such processing can be done very quickly. Approvals obtained this way are only good for a maximum of 6 months, allowing enough time to obtain approval through the normal process, if necessary. Emergency processing is only to be used to respond to circumstances that could not be foreseen and when the use of regular procedures would result in significant harm to the public or the program. Failure to plan, avoidance of embarrassment, etc., are not valid justifications. Requests for emergency processing must be approved in advance by the OMB Desk Officer responsible for IMLS. Consult with the IMLS Clearance Officer.
The PRA exempts certain categories of data collections from the process. However, if you are planning a data collection involving 10 or more respondents in any 12-month period, the need for OMB review should be determined by the IMLS Clearance Officer.
Does a form really need to display the burden statement and the OMB number on the approved data collection instrument?
Yes, all of this information must be displayed for the respondent. Ideally, this information should be located on the first page of the data collection instrument or the instructions and/or script. If spacing is a problem on the form or screen then other considerations, are to include the information on a cover sheet, or keep the OMB number on the first page and add the burden statement to the last page of the form. See further information under "What Do You Need to Do After Getting PRA Clearance?"
A generic clearance obtains OMB approval for a master plan for a number of similar surveys that have the same general purpose (e.g. customer surveys). Individual surveys conducted under the clearance are reviewed by OMB on a fast-track basis and the process involves less documentation. Generic clearances provide more flexibility for certain types of surveys, but they can be harder to track and are not appropriate for many types of information collection efforts.
What happens if IMLS has already conducted a collection for which PRA approval was not obtained? What happens if IMLS does not obtain PRA approval for a future collection?
The Paperwork Reduction Act is a law and failure to comply with the requirements of the Act is breaking the law. The Director for Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) is the senior policy official responsible for compliance with the law. When OMB becomes aware of a violation of the Paperwork Reduction Act it is brought to the IMLS Director's attention. If the violation is not resolved in a timely manner, the issue is raised in OMB's management chain and can result in official Departmental reprimands and may have budget implications.
If an unapproved collection has already occurred and it is ongoing in nature, the program office should bring the violation to the attention of the IMLS Clearance Officer and work to resolve the violation as soon as possible. If an unapproved collection is conducted and it is a one-time collection, there is no further action that IMLS can take to rectify the violation in the short term.
While the consequences of violating the Paperwork Reduction Act do not involve fines or jail sentences, there are legal ramifications to conducting or sponsoring a collection of information without OMB approvals. When a collection occurs without approval, IMLS leaves itself open to lawsuits from individuals in the public.
Unapproved requirements in rules cannot be enforced. You cannot punish anyone for not responding to such a requirement. The only exception is if a law specifically requires the public to submit information. For collections where the response is voluntary, mandatory or required to obtain or retain a benefit, if OMB discovers the collection it will instruct IMLS to stop the collection and get clearance. If IMLS ignores this, or develops a record of conducting unapproved collections, OMB has many ways of making IMLS regret its behavior. For example, Federal agencies have experienced a number of instances in which enforcement action was blocked due to deficiencies in the OMB clearance of the information collection.
I haven't developed a PRA submission in quite a while. It appears that some of the guidance I see now contradict previous guidance I had been given. Has anything changed?
It is quite possible. Congress passed a new version of the PRA in 1995, and OMB then issued new regulations. Both the procedures for clearance and the applicability of the Act were changed. So advice or guidance given a few years ago may no longer be valid. For assistance in developing an ICR, consult with IMLS Clearance Officer.
The Information Collection Budget (ICB) is the vehicle through which OMB, in consultation with each federal agency, sets "annual agency goals to reduce information collection burdens imposed on the public." The ICB serves as a management oversight tool and as an adjunct to the transactional case-by-case review of agency requests for approval required by the PRA. IMLS completes the ICB each year utilizing data collected.
The PRA requires that you provide the public with certain information about your clearance request in the form of a "Paperwork Reduction Act statement", which you have already included on the forms submitted with the clearance request, following the instructions for making a request in Attachment A. If OMB approves the request you must make sure that this information is actually incorporated into your collection – e.g. on all forms, online or printed, or in the instructions for them. Here is the format and required content for the statement, with the information to be filled in by the sponsor indicated in parentheses:
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average ___ (minutes/hours) per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other suggestions for reducing this burden to (name), IMLS, (email address).
(Statement on: 1) confidentiality of the information, citing the statute your guarantee is based on, 2) how anonymity will be maintained or 3) the information collected is public information and not confidential. If data will be included in reports in aggregate form only, always state so. What you say here will reflect your PRA request's supporting statement, Part A, #10). Notwithstanding any other provisions of the law, no person is required to respond to, nor shall any person be subjected to a penalty for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act, unless that collection of information displays a currently valid OMB Control Number.
It depends. You can make minor changes to a collection – using a change worksheet - without having to obtain additional OMB approval, but the changes must really be minor. You need OMB approval (through the complete clearance process) if you are significantly adding to the number of respondents involved or if you are adding substantial questions (even if you are dropping other questions so that the overall burden imposed is unchanged). Ask your program officer for advice.
The information provided is to help answer any questions that you may have on clearance requirements, to provide you with the guidance needed to prepare and submit a clearance request when that is necessary, to ensure that the submission made meets OMB's standards for approval, and to inform you of OMB action and what final steps may be needed to comply with OMB requirements.