The Institute uses a peer review process to evaluate all eligible and complete applications. Reviewers are professionals in the field with relevant knowledge and expertise in the types of project activities identified in the applications. They are instructed to evaluate applications according to the Review Criteria identified in the program guidelines. Reviewer conflicts of interest are identified prior to review, and reviewers who may have conflicts with particular applications are reassigned to review other projects.
The Director takes into account the advice provided by the review process and makes final funding decisions consistent with the purposes of the agency’s programs.
Check grant program guidelines for information on when the program office expects to notify both funded and unfunded applicants of final award decisions.